Dear Mr Stephens,
I am very disappointed that even despite the widely
published concern that the speed camera was a factor in the death of Timothy
Rowsell, DRS refuses to even consider the possibility that cameras may have
any negative impact on road safety, and even goes as far as to refuse to
communicate with operators who are quite clearly capable of recording and
feeding back dangerous reactions such as panic braking on fast roads (which
would quite obviously become "validated evidence"), and only resorts to the
technicalities of whether or not the equipment is legal, regardless of the
realities.
Yes, I have no evidence that speed cameras cause
drivers to brake, sometimes erratically. Neither do I (or probably anyone
else) have any evidence that eating cigarettes would not be good for your
health. But if you refuse to acknowledge that drivers brake for cameras, you are
either being dishonest or you are even more out of touch than even I thought you
were, either way, a totally unacceptable situation for someone with a
responsibility for saving life.
This deepens the impression that DRS follows it's
own agenda without consideration of the actual consequences, even if that might
be providing one part of the scenario that might result in an injury or death.
Your clarification of question 2 answers a different
question to the one asked. You know of no deaths "attributed to"
a speed camera. I asked "I would like to know the number of deaths / serious
injuries that have been investigated where the presence of a fixed or mobile
speed camera was found to have been a contributory factor."
Please can you answer this question.
Surely, DRS in it's responsibility to reduce deaths
and injuries on the roads, should be doing more than just "following the rules",
it should be constantly trying to find ways of doing things better and being
more effective. Just blaming it on the "Home Office" is typical of all
communications I've had with all of the Dorset Councils / Police / authorities
on this subject.
In the real world, where companies have to compete
and survive based purely on results, the attitude of DRS and the multitude of
other organisations making a mess of road safety in Dorset, would result in
failure in no time at all.
I hope you will respond further on this, I will hold
off for the moment in writing to the information commissioner.
Regards, Ian Belchamber
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 12:45 PM
Subject: Serial Number: 0001/04/11 Your email dated Tuesday 10th May 2011
Dear Mr. Belchamber,
I have reviewed the questions you
presented in your email of 12 April 2011 and the FOI Manager’s response to those
questions of 10 May 2011, my findings are as follows:
The answers supplied to questions 1 & 4
have not been challenged and are therefore not discussed.
The answer supplied to Question 2 is
correct as you use the terminology “may have been” – this wording requires
speculation as agreed by Dorset Police Legal Advisors. However, I know of
no known road deaths that have been attributed to a safety camera’s presence in
Dorset.
The answer supplied to Question 3 is
correct. You make assumptions based with no validated evidence presented.
Safety Cameras are type approved for use by the Home Office and I have no record
or validated evidence presented to me of any negative effects of their use in
road safety. I will not ask operators for their opinions on “negative”
effects of safety cameras as again that would be speculation on their part.
If you wish to challenge the use of safety cameras you may wish to contact the
Home Office.
If you wish to appeal against my
findings you may contact the Information Commissioners’ Office at the address
below:
Wycliffe House
Water Lane
Wilmslow
Cheshire
SK9 5AF
Regards
Johnny Stephens
Johnny Stephens
Head of Fixed Penalties
Dorset Police Headquarters
Winfrith,
Dorchester DT2 8DZ
':
01305 227555
8:
Johnny.Stephens@Dorset.pnn.police.uk
::
www.dorset.police.uk
Committed to A Safer
Dorset for You
Dear Mr Stephens,
I am obviously entirely dissatisfied with this totally inadequate response.
Please can you provide some proper answers, I will clarify some points to assist
with this:
2. I require no speculation, I would like to know the number of deaths / serious
injuries that have been investigated where the presence of a fixed or mobile
speed camera was found to have been a contributory factor.
3. DRS (and it's operators) MUST be aware of the panic braking caused by speed
cameras and the resulting dangers, amongst other negative effects. Please show
some honesty, integrity, and balance (for once) and answer this question
properly.
Regards,
Ian Belchamber
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 9:02 AM
Subject: RE: Motorcyclist killed - at mobile speed trap - information
required
Dear Mr
Belchamber,
Serial Number:
0001/04/11 (Please quote this reference in future correspondence regarding this
submission).
Thank you for
your email of 12 April 2011 regarding the Road Traffic Accident on the A338.
1. No DRS
operations have been suspended. I will not answer further questions on
this subject.
2. This is
not a question under the FOI Act and as there is no qualified evidence would
require speculation. I will not answer further questions on this subject.
3. This is
not a question under the FOI Act and as there is no qualified evidence would
require speculation. I will not answer further questions on this subject.
4. This is
not a question DRS can answer – you would have to direct this question to Dorset
Police FOI.
In the event that
you wish to complain about the manner in which your enquiry has been handled,
you should write in the first instance to:
Head of the Fixed
Penalty Department
Dorset
Police
Dorset
Police Headquarters
Winfrith
Dorset
DT2 8DZ
Regards
Brian Austin
Freedom of
Information Manager
From:
Ian Belchamber (gmail) [mailto:ianbelchamber@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 April 2011 13:25
To:
Searle, Colin; Stephens, Johnny;
Austin, Brian;
info@dorsetsafetycameras.org.uk; Garrett, Pat; .Dorset Roadsafe
Subject: Motorcyclist killed - at
mobile speed trap - information required
Please feel free to respond to this “informally” or through the FOI process.
Following the death of the motorcyclist who it seemed braked and skidded on the
A338 last Saturday in response to seeing a mobile speed camera van, I asked for
mobile speed camera operations to be suspended in Dorset, until any
investigations into this death are complete, and until an independent and proper
investigation into effectiveness of all speed cameras, taking into account such
negative effects, has been fully completed.
-
Could you please confirm if
you will be suspending mobile speed camera operations or not.
-
Could you let me know in how
many road deaths in Dorset the presence of a
fixed or mobile speed camera may have been a contributory factor.
-
Is Dorset Road Safe aware of
any “negative effects” of speed cameras and if so could it please list these.
-
Could you let me know what
investigations will be taking place into this death and how I can contribute to
those investigations.
Thanks, Ian Belchamber