Councils will be forced by the government to publish accident figures from
before and after speed cameras were installed
Speed cameras that fail to reduce accidents are to be switched off under a new
government policy.
From next month, local authorities will be forced to reveal whether individual
cameras are making any difference to safety on the stretch of road on which they
are located or are simply generating revenue for the government. Ministers say
they expect devices that are little more than money-spinners to be dismantled.
It follows mounting public anger over the huge sums being made by some
speed cameras with little apparent impact on road safety. One notorious
Gatso camera on the southbound M11 in Essex generates up to £1m a year.
Motorists who regularly use that stretch of carriageway say they believe the
machine is causing, rather than preventing, accidents as drivers brake suddenly
to avoid the trap.
Ministers will tomorrow announce that councils must publish figures showing the
numbers of accidents and casualties at camera sites before and after the
machines were installed, so the public can see whether individual cameras are
justified.
The new policy follows a government pledge to “end the war on the motorist”The
Highways Agency will have to publish similar information about cameras on
motorways.
Mike Penning, the road safety minister, said: “We want to stop motorists being
used as cash cows. For too long information about speed cameras has been hidden
in the shadows. These new data will end that by clearly showing whether a camera
is saving lives or just making money.”
Councils will be expected to start publishing the information by July 20, and
have been told to include annual collision and casualty data back to 1990,
showing numbers of people killed and injured at each site.
They will also be forced to reveal how they decide where individual cameras are
positioned; the number of prosecutions arising from each fixed camera in their
area each year; and the number of offenders fined or taken to court. It will be
the first time such data has been made publicly available across England.
Although ministers will not be able to force local authorities to switch off
cameras that make no difference to road safety, they expect councils to act.
“Once this information is out there, we expect councils to come under intense
pressure from communities to shut certain cameras down, and we expect they will
act on that,” said a Whitehall source.
The new policy follows a government pledge to “end the war on the motorist”.
Oxfordshire switched off its speed cameras last year after the government cut
local authorities’ funding for road safety by 40%, from £95m to £57m. In turn,
Oxfordshire council cut its funding to the Thames Valley Safer Roads
Partnership, which said it could therefore no longer afford to run Oxfordshire’s
fixed cameras.
In April this year, Thames Valley Police switched Oxfordshire’s speed cameras
back on. During the eight months the cameras were off there were 18 deaths on
the roads in Oxfordshire — none at fixed camera sites — compared with 12 in the
same period in the previous year. Speed cameras in other counties are still
being switched off and the partnerships that run them closed.
Money generated by speed cameras goes direct to the Treasury, which
redistributes some of it via the Department for Transport to local authorities.
There are about 6,000 cameras across Britain, generating an estimated £100m a
year.
The price of safety
The number of fixed speed cameras in England and Wales has risen from 48 in 1992
to 3,144 this year. There are a further 3,000 mobile speed cameras.
More than 1m motorists were fined and given penalty points in 2009, compared
with 651,000 in 2000.
One of the most lucrative cameras is on a 30mph stretch of dual
carriageway in Poole, Dorset. It was reported last year to be generating £1.3m a
year.
From 1999 local camera partnerships were allowed to spend the fines. In 2007 the
fines went direct to central government, which instead provided £110m a year to
local authorities for road safety.